top of page
  • Michael Parker

Common Mistakes in SIS Implementation

Updated: Aug 1



Implementing a new Student Information System (SIS) is a significant task for any educational institution. These systems are crucial for managing student data, streamlining administrative tasks, and improving communication within the school community. However, the journey to a successful SIS implementation comes with challenges. I have identified some common mistakes schools make during this process:


  • Choosing a Solution That Doesn't Fit Often, when the excitement over advanced functionalities meets the frustration with the current SIS, things can be missed in the SIS selection process. When I see a school with two SISs, it often has occurred because the SIS selection process didn’t include the financial needs of the school. This leads to the cumbersome situation of juggling between two systems instead of streamlining to one.

  • Inadequate Resourcing SIS projects are massive undertakings that require significant time and attention. Expecting the Head of IT to manage this transition on top of their regular duties is unrealistic. Schools need to allocate adequate resources, including staffing and time, to ensure the project’s success without overburdening their employees. If these resources do not exist within the school, the school should consider external resources to ensure the success of the project.

  • Insufficient Budgeting An appropriate budget should reflect the project's scale and its impact on the school's operations. It should account for unforeseen expenses that often arise during such comprehensive projects. Costs that might not be known at the start of the project could be additional training, additional software or development to enhance the overall user experience, risk mitigation, and scope creep. Starting with an insufficient budget will mean that when the project runs into difficulty, there may be a lack of budget to help deal with the issues.

  • Lack of Executive Sponsorship The absence of an executive project sponsor can severely hinder the momentum of an SIS implementation. This role is not just administrative but serves as a bridge between the project team and the decision-makers. The sponsor’s ability to make or facilitate crucial decisions promptly is indispensable for overcoming obstacles and ensuring progress. This also creates clear reporting lines for the project team.

  • Underestimating the Impact of Change Change management is often overlooked in SIS projects. Communicating changes effectively, identifying potential resistance, and working proactively to address concerns are critical to the project's acceptance and success. Underestimating this aspect can lead to staff pushback and low system adoption rates.

  • Data Migration Challenges The complexity of migrating and cleaning up data is frequently underestimated. Schools need to recognize that data migration is a meticulous process that often takes much longer than anticipated. The older the school, the more data, and the more likely it is that the school will need more time spent on cleaning up that data.

  • Neglecting Systems Architecture in Strategic Planning A common mistake in SIS implementation is overlooking the systems architecture and its alignment with the school's strategic goals. Evaluate whether the SIS can fully support your objectives or if it requires augmentation through additional integrations. Consider the implications of these integrations on the system's architecture—will they enhance functionality or complicate the user experience with different user interfaces? Ensuring the SIS fits within your overall systems architecture is crucial for achieving a seamless, efficient educational ecosystem without necessitating future overhauls.

  • Not Designating Process Owners Process owners are staff with the responsibility for the oversight, management, and execution of specific processes. In the proof of concept and pilot phases of implmentation, process owners will provide essential feedback about how things need to change. During data migration, process owners may also be called upon to validate data. (credit to Peter Cottle for pointing out this omission)

  • Overlooking Data Security and Privacy Aspects While I think many of my colleagues will ask questions about data security, company security certifications, pen tests, how they backup and secure their data it's worth digging a bit deeper or sideways a bit. While extracting and importing data from one system to another can involve complication related to how that data is transfered, where it is stored, when it will be deleted. It is also important to consider who has access and the level of their access in the sandpit/test environment. Both situations could lead to a data breach. (credit to Rishan W for raising this one)


Conclusion A successful SIS implementation is not just about selecting the right software; it's about meticulous planning, adequate resourcing, and effective change management. By addressing these common mistakes, schools can significantly improve the odds of their SIS project’s success, leading to a more efficient, responsive, and data-driven educational environment.

30 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comentários


Let's Work Together.

 

Parker IT was born of the idea that we could make a different in education providing IT services at an affordable price.

  • LinkedIn

© 2024 PARKER IT

IT Solutions & Consulting at its best.

bottom of page